It was well written and very informative. In fact, your Rolex Ladies Replica watches blog was one of the reason I am now in the hunt for a 15300.It is to my surprise that you have traded your 15300 to a Jumbo. Im really curious what made you do it since youve made a very strong case on why the 15300 is a more interesting proposition than the Jumbo and I fully agree (and still do) to all your points.Mind you, in no way I would change my mind in getting the 15300 but I would just like to gather your thoughts on what made you decide.For me, to consider that Jumbo it would have to be a vintage one and should at least come from the 1980′s and not the current. Being a fan of new technology, the 15300 suits my character well. Again, this is a matter of personal taste and Im looking forward to your reply.Thank you,JohnToday, I replied to John and thought that it would be nice to post it here as well, since I reckon that there are more potential Royal Oak buyers Rolex Ladies Replica watches struggling with the same thoughts and questions about the ref.15300 and the ref.15202.
About a year ago, I wrote that the Royal Oak Date ref.15300 could be more interesting than the famous Royal Oak Jumbo Ref.15202 (click here for the article). Not long after that article, I decided to pull the trigger on Royal Oak Date. On the 24th of December 2009, I did a trade-up to the Jumbo because it crossed my path.Now, I just received a message from John over at WatchUseek writing the following (left out some non-relevant information for this blog post):I have read your articles comparing the Jumbo Rolex Ladies Replica watches and the 15300. First of all, congratulations on a very nice review.
